Service Area: Collection Services

Bankruptcy Proof of Claim: Don’t Forget!

Bankruptcies Are on the Rise; Remember Your Bankruptcy Proof of Claim

It’s “officially” unofficial, we may be heading into another recession. Think back to 2008 and you’re sure to remember the painful increase in debtor defaults and bankruptcies; virtually no creditor’s AR escaped unscathed. With bankruptcies on the rise, it is increasingly likely you will need to complete a bankruptcy proof of claim either as a secured or unsecured creditor.

The Secured Creditor Ideal

In the event of a debtor’s bankruptcy, you will ideally be a secured creditor who properly filed a mechanic’s lien, bond claim or UCC. Secured transactions are proven to put creditors in the best possible position to get paid, though there are additional securities available such as a Corporate Guarantee or Personal Guarantee.

What is a Bankruptcy Proof of Claim?

A proof of claim is a document filed within the bankruptcy court that alerts the court, debtor, Trustee, and other interested parties that a creditor wishes to register a claim against the assets of the bankruptcy estate. This document is important because it provides proof that the claim is valid and owed, and notifies the Trustee of the creditor’s claim as well as to what class the claim should be associated.

What Information is Included in the Bankruptcy Proof of Claim?

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s official form includes fields for various pieces of information such as creditor name and location, the amount of the claim, the basis of the claim, whether the claim is secured, if the claim is based on a lease, and whether the claim is subject to right of setoff.

A Class to Associate the Claim?

Yes, in bankruptcy proceedings, creditors are put into various classes. The bankruptcy code is specific, detailed and, well…it’s long – but here is the basic payout priority:

Payout Priority in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

  1. Secured Creditors (i.e. creditors who have a perfected security interest)
  2. Administrative Expenses (i.e. costs associated with filing & processing the bankruptcy)
  3. Unsecured Creditors (i.e. creditors without a security interest)

Here’s an example of the class breakdown in the recent bankruptcy plan for Fred’s, Inc.

bankruptcy proof of claim 1

And here’s the Summary of Estimated Recoveries for Claims and Interests:

bankruptcy proof of claim 2

I’ll take this opportunity to point out that secured creditors often fair far better than unsecured creditors. In this bankruptcy, it is estimated that secured creditors will recover 100% of their claims, while unsecured creditors will receive between 4%-8.8% of their claims.

A Bar Date? Like a Date at a Bar?

Bar date and date at a bar are most definitely two different things, though it’s possible they have the same level of fun & excitement. Depending on the bankruptcy, a Bar Date may be set by the court. This date is a deadline by which all creditors must file their proof of claims within the bankruptcy court. It is critical that the proof of claim is filed correctly and timely, whether it’s secured or unsecured, to ensure creditors’ rights are preserved and to maximize any possible distribution.

What You Should Do

When a creditor receives notice that their debtor has filed bankruptcy, the notice should be reviewed to determine if a proof of claim needs to be filed.

  • Be on Time: Too often, creditors miss the bar date to file.
  • Know your Claim: Include all amounts owed for all accounts and affiliates.
  • Secured or Unsecured: Know whether you are a secured creditor and file properly.

Note, a creditor can have a secured & unsecured claim in the same bankruptcy.

Need Help?

Let us prepare, file, and monitor for a recorded proof of claim! For more information on how NCS Credit can assist in filing your bankruptcy proof of claim, contact us today.

Bankruptcy Proof of Claim Is Late

error illustration

“Judge, My Bankruptcy Proof of Claim is Late, But I Have a Good Reason!”

And What’s the Reason? “Um, I Forgot My Password.”

We’ve discussed bankruptcy proofs of claim before and the importance of filing them timely (i.e., don’t miss the bar date!). And when this case crossed my desk, I couldn’t help but share it with you. Why? Because it’s a $53 million example of the bankruptcy courts not messing around. When the bar date is set, you’d better have a darn good excuse for missing it, because a deadline is a deadline – you miss it, you lose it. What’s a good excuse? Well, I’ll give you a hint, waiting until the last minute and forgetting your password is not a good excuse, as one attorney discovered.

Briefly, What Is a Bankruptcy Proof of Claim?

A proof of claim is a document filed within the bankruptcy court that alerts the court, debtor, Trustee, and other interested parties that a creditor wishes to register a claim against the assets of the bankruptcy estate. This document is important because it provides proof that the claim is valid and owed and it notifies the Trustee of the creditor’s claim as well as to what class the claim should be associated.

The Bar Date is a Deadline, Don’t Miss It

The Case: In re U-Haul Co. of W. Va., 2:21-bk-20140 (Bankr. S.D.W. Va. Dec. 10, 2021)

Quick Backstory: About 10 years prior to the bankruptcy filing, there was a class action lawsuit against U-Haul. The Ferrell Class (the class action claimant) was comprised of over 320,000 claimants and sought over $53 million in compensation from the lawsuit.

Fast Forward to Bankruptcy Case: U-Haul Co. of W. Va. filed for bankruptcy protection June 2021. On July 23, 2021, the Clerk of Court set the bar date for August 25, 2021 (So, all parties with claims had a little over a month to file their claim.)

A separate order was entered to allow the Ferrell Class to file claims on behalf of the entire class – which makes sense — what a pain it would be to deal with 320,000+ individual claims. When the court entered the order for the Ferrell Class to file its claim, it included the following:

“The deadline for the Class Claims is August 25, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. The Class Claims must be actually received by the Clerk of the Court on or before that date and time, or such claims shall be forever barred.”

The order also included the various ways to submit the claims: file electronically, in person, via mail, etc.

Claim is Late, Debtor Wants the Claim Barred: OK, I’m going to paraphrase here, but essentially the attorney filing the claim on behalf of the Ferrell Class sat down at his computer late in the day on August 25. He goes to log in to PACER (court electronic filing system) to file the claim, but he can’t remember the login information. I picture someone saying “Uh, the dog ate my homework” but circa 2021/2022 with “Um, Judge, I can’t remember my password.” Because it’s after business hours, there is no one to help him reset his online access, AND since he waited till the last minute, he scrambled to try and do the next best thing… email?

According to the court opinion, the attorney “emailed the Ferrell Class Claim to all counsel in the case one hour and twenty-six minutes late and filed the claim nine hours and 45 minutes late upon obtaining the correct filing credentials.”

The court was not amused. I’m picturing a student being scolded by a teacher – “You’ve had ample time. You’ve done this correctly before. I don’t understand what the problem is.” Of course, the court wasn’t quite so casual or crass, and heard the attorney out.

But It’s an Honest Excusable Mistake: Ultimately, the debtor wanted the Ferrell Claim barred because it was late. The attorney for the Ferrell Class argued that “technical difficulties” (i.e., I can’t remember my password) made it impossible for him to file his claim, and the claim should be allowed as timely under the “excusable neglect” standard.

I will save you from the cringeworthy efforts and excuses (though you can click here to read it in the opinion) and summarize: the attorney pleaded with the court to not punish the class for the missteps of the attorney.

Alas, the court determined the attorney’s neglect was inexcusable. “The reason for the delay in filing was entirely within the control of counsel to the Ferrell Class… the Ferrell Class had ample notice of the Bar Date as well as the dire consequences that would result from missing the deadline.” 

Oh boy, here it comes:

“This failure to plan and allot necessary time to file the proof of claim was not due to any “technical difficulties” as the Ferrell Class asserts. The Ferrell Class does not allege that the late filing was caused by any defect of the CM/ECF system. It is no excuse that the Clerk’s office was closed when counsel attempted to file the claim after business hours on the night it was due. Counsel had over a month to file the claim, during which he could have contacted the Clerk’s office during business hours at his convenience. The deadline was missed in this case due to a careless disregard for the Bar Date, applicable Bankruptcy Rules, and the explicit terms of the Bar Date Order. Compliance with the deadline (or not) was entirely within the control of counsel to the Ferrell Class, and the failure to comply under these circumstances is inexcusable.”

What’s the saying?

“A lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.”

Yeah… it fits.

This is a painful – $53M painful – lesson in missed deadlines.

Creditor in a Bankruptcy? Always Remember

  • Be on Time: Too often, creditors miss the bar date to file. Today’s case in point!
  • Know your Claim: Include all amounts owed for all accounts and affiliates.
  • Secured or Unsecured: Know whether you are a secured creditor and file properly. (Note, a creditor can have a secured & unsecured claim in the same bankruptcy.)

Need Help? NCS can assist in filing your bankruptcy proof of claim, contact us today!

Bankruptcy Proof of Claim: What if It’s Late?

What Happens to Your Claim if Your Bankruptcy Proof of Claim is Late?

Bankruptcy proofs of claim are your key to ensuring the Trustee is aware of funds owed to you by the bankrupt party. And, just like filing UCCs or mechanic’s liens, there are deadlines in play for proofs of claim. What happens to your claim if your proof of claim is filed late? A Bankruptcy Court in North Carolina recently decided one creditor was not entitled to distribution of funds, because its proof of claim reached the court one day after the bar date.

The Bankruptcy Proof of Claim

A proof of claim is a document filed within the bankruptcy court that alerts the court, debtor, Trustee, and other interested parties that a creditor wishes to register a claim against the assets of the bankruptcy estate. This document is important because it provides proof that the claim is valid and owed, and notifies the Trustee of the creditor’s claim as well as to what class the claim should be associated.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court’s official form includes fields for various pieces of information, such as creditor name and location, the amount of the claim, the basis of the claim, whether the claim is secured, if the claim is based on a lease, and whether the claim is subject to right of setoff.

The Bar Date

The bar date is a deadline by which all creditors must file their proof of claims within the bankruptcy court. It is critical that the proof of claim is filed correctly and timely, whether it’s secured or unsecured, to ensure creditors’ rights are preserved and to maximize any possible distribution.

A Day Late Means Your Hanging Out with the General Unsecured Creditors

In the bankruptcy case of North Carolina New Schools, Inc., the bar date was set for September 13, 2016. One creditor, WorkSmart, Inc., mailed its proof of claim around September 7, 2016, and its claim was received by the court September 14, 2016. One day after the bar date. The bankruptcy Trustee filed an objection to avoid the creditor’s claim, arguing the creditor failed to file its claim timely. The creditor filed a response, claiming a “…’mailbox presumption’ creates a rebuttable presumption that the Claim was received in the ordinary course of business.”

A mailbox presumption? Yeah, I didn’t know what it was either. According to the court “The mailbox presumption is a common law evidentiary principle that permits a party to prove receipt of a document that has been mailed.” Essentially, the creditor argued that because the document was allegedly mailed timely, it should be considered received timely. And although I initially chuckled at the word “common” it is apparently a popular topic. The court went on to explain that courts are split, and there isn’t a definitive answer as to whether the mailbox presumption should apply in the mailing of a proof of claim.

Unfortunately for this creditor, the court decided there is a difference between service of a document and the filing of a document (we just talked about this in another post), and it is the creditor’s responsibility to ensure the document is filed by the deadline.

“…applying the mailbox presumption to the mailing of a proof of claim would complicate, bring uncertainty, and cause undue delay to the bankruptcy claims process. Setting a bright-line rule for the filing of claims is vital to the timely administration of a chapter 7 case. Creditors, with minimal expense or inconvenience, can ensure that a proof of claim is received by the clerk’s office before the deadline by filing their claims electronically or directly at the clerk’s office counter, using some form of priority or overnight mail, or calling the clerk’s office to verify the receipt of the claim.”

And just like that, the creditor’s claim for $169,569 was not entitled to distribution, because it was filed a day late.

The Bankruptcy Proof of Claim Lesson

Make sure your proof of claim is received by the bar date. Navigating a proof of claim? Contact us today and let our experts help you!

Survey: Securitization on A/R During the Pandemic

Credit Research Foundation Survey: The Use & Impact of Securitization on A/R During the Pandemic

Originally published in The Credit Research Foundation’s Perspective newsletter (June 2021)

The Credit Research Foundation recently surveyed their membership on the use and impact of securitization (UCCs, mechanic’s lien, etc.) on accounts receivable during the pandemic. The survey explored the use of securitization as a risk mitigation tool.

“I Believe There Will Be an Increase in Bankruptcies During 2021.”

Unsurprisingly, 88% of respondents believe there will be an increase in bankruptcies in 2021. In general, 2020 saw a low rate of bankruptcies, in fact Epiq reported bankruptcy filings across all chapters were at their lowest point since 1986. However, commercial Chapter 11 bankruptcies continued to rise year over year, with a 29% increase in 2020, for a total of 7,128 filings. Forecasts indicate bankruptcy filings will increase in 2021, with a predicted spike in Q3 2021.

Why Will Bankruptcy Filings Increase in 2021?

This is certainly a question on many credit professionals’ minds as the challenges of the economy, government stimulus and indebtedness in the marketplace plague the overall portfolio risk of many organizations.  Additionally, Congress extended Sub-Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code (small business) and the grace period to file under the extended debt levels ($7.5 million) an additional year, which now expires in March of 2022.  Given these factors there seems to be an awareness to the potential for at least certain segments of the economy to file for bankruptcy.  Anecdotally, conversations from many members of the Foundation have all eyes on Q3 and Q4 of 2021 as a pivotal and anticipated point for the next level of bankruptcy activity.

In an earlier NCS survey, 62% of respondents were actively monitoring their customers for bankruptcy. Continue to monitor your customers, and if there is a bankruptcy, ensure to complete your Proof of Claim by the bar date.

“Our Company Has Been an Unsecured Creditor in a Bankruptcy and Recovered Less Money Than Secured Creditors.”

An overwhelming 90% of respondents have suffered as unsecured creditors in a bankruptcy, watching from the sidelines as secured creditors recovered payments in full. These losses are preventable and at minimal cost. Secured transactions are your greatest defense against customer failure. Time & time again, we see secured creditors receive payment in full while unsecured creditors receive pennies on the dollar.

For example, Katy Industries, a leading manufacturer, importer, and distributor of commercial cleaning and consumer storage products, filed for bankruptcy when it was unable to meet the obligations of its creditors, with nearly $56 million of debt. In this case, secured creditors recovered the total amount of allowed claims (100%) while unsecured creditors faced a recovery rate of only 9.6%.

Another example comes from the healthcare industry. Holmes, Inc., provided health & wellbeing programs nationwide. When it filed for bankruptcy protection, its capital deficit was $31.5 million. According to the bankruptcy plan, secured creditors were to receive 100% of their claims and unsecured creditors were to receive approximately 3.5% of their claims.

Need more? In the Hostess bankruptcy, secured creditors recovered 100% and unsecured creditors recovered 0. In Kodak’s bankruptcy, secured creditors recovered 100% and unsecured creditors recovered 4-5%. Then there was Uno, where secured creditors received 100% and unsecureds received 13%. And HomeBanc Corp. distributed 100% of claims to secured creditors and unsecureds recovered anywhere from 1-10%.

“Our Company Currently Secures Our Accounts Receivable, Either in Full or Partially.”

83% of respondents currently secure their A/R. For the 17% who don’t currently secure A/R, the top two cited reasons are concerns about customer reaction and the costs associated with securing A/R, followed by no significant write-offs, no need, and reliance on 503(b)9 claims. A respondent from the manufacturing industry stated they do not secure A/R because “We have an 85% recovery rate as a Critical Vendor in our industry.”

Let’s circle back to the top two cited reasons for not securing A/R:  concerns about customer reaction and costs. First, it’s OK to be nervous about how your customer will respond to your request for a signed Security Agreement (needed to file UCCs) or your customer’s reaction when they receive a preliminary notice (needed to secure mechanic’s lien rights) via certified mail. But rest assured, these are traditional business practices that do not harm your customer’s creditworthiness or cost your customer a dime. UCCs and preliminary notices/mechanic’s liens secure your right to recover payment in the unlikely event your customer defaults or files bankruptcy. If your customer never defaults or files for bankruptcy, it’s as though the UCC/lien never existed.

As for the costs associated with UCCs and preliminary notices/mechanic’s liens, they are nominal compared to the hundreds of thousands of dollars you could lose as an unsecured creditor. These are general numbers, but a blanket UCC filing may cost around $100 and a PMSI filing with search & notify may cost around $175, and the protection is in place for 5 years. As for preliminary notices/mechanic’s liens, let’s focus on the preliminary notice. Why? Because research shows 97.3% of the time a preliminary notice is enough to get you paid. Generally, a preliminary notice may cost around $60 per project. Now, mechanic’s liens may have a higher price tag ($500+) but again, when compared to what you could lose, it’s a small price to pay.

Lastly, I do want to mention that 503(b)9 claims are a great resource; however, there are some pitfalls. The bankruptcy code was amended in 2005 to include a new administrative claim: 503(b)(9). With the addition of 503(b)(9) claims, some creditors became complacent. The availability of a 503(b)(9) claim seemed to misleadingly allay creditor concerns, “Nah, I don’t need UCC filings. We just file a 503(b)(9) to get paid.” This somewhat false sense of security can easily cost creditors millions of dollars.

Under 503(b)(9), creditors may file a claim for “the value of any goods received by the debtor within the 20 days before the date of commencement of a case under this title in which the goods have been sold to the debtor in the ordinary course of such debtor’s business.”

As you can imagine, there are challenges with 503(b)(9) claims. High-profile cases are in heated debate over the definition of “received by” for the 20-day rule. And, of course, there is the question of what constitutes a “good” because services are not covered under these claims, and whether those goods have been sold in the ordinary course of business.

A member of the panel at CRF’s Fall Forum, Judge Christopher S. Sontchi, Chief Judge of The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, has presided over several cases determining “goods” and “receipt.” Notably, in one case, Judge Sontchi looked to the UCC definition of goods and subsequently held that electricity is not a “good” under 503(b)(9).

To be clear, a UCC filing is not without potential obstacles. Your UCC must be properly perfected and there is a narrow margin for error. But, ensuring a UCC has been properly perfected is less cumbersome than proving goods are goods, defining date of receipt and verifying goods are sold during ordinary course of business. 

Rounding Out the Survey

How Are Creditors Securing A/R?

For creditors securing their A/R the top two security measures were Cash in Advance and UCC filings.

How Are Creditors Securing AR

Biggest Concerns with UCC Filings

Despite concerns surrounding UCC filings, respondents certainly recognize the benefits of UCC filings. Benefits include being a secured creditor in a bankruptcy, the ability to repossess goods if customer defaults, the customer will consider creditor a greater payment priority and there would be public record of the debt.

Biggest Concerns with UCC Filings

Biggest Concerns with Protecting Mechanic’s Lien Rights

Similar to what we see with UCC filings, respondents agree protecting mechanic’s lien rights would make them a secured creditor in the event of bankruptcy, customers would consider the creditor a greater payment priority and there would be public record of the debt.

Biggest Concerns with Mechanic's Liens

Secured Transactions are Excellent Way to Secure A/R

Whether you file UCCs or mechanic’s liens:

  • You are a priority. In bankruptcy, secured creditors have priority and are paid before unsecured creditors.
  • You can sell more. Securing your A/R allows you to extend larger credit limits and sell to those accounts that were previously out of reach.
  • Fewer write-offs. Fewer write-offs lower the costs associated with your product. Lower costs mean you can sell your product at a lower price while maintaining viable profit margins. Selling at a lower price makes your company more competitive, opening the doors to a larger market share. More sales with stable profit margins are a win.
  • Improved DSO. Here’s a testimonial from one of our clients: “After implementing the lien/notice to owner program, we have seen our DSO numbers steadily decline each month, to an average of around 22 days. That is over a 30% improvement in our DSO since we first partnered with NCS.”
  • Low cost solutions. UCC filings and preliminary notices/mechanic’s liens are truly a low-cost solution; especially when compared to the costs associated with chasing receivables.

NCS Insights for Credit Management in 2021

Bankruptcy Climate of 2020, Predictions for 2021, and What You Need to Do to Ensure Your Company is a Secured Creditor

The events of 2020 will not soon be forgotten. A year that began with hope and optimism was quickly darkened by a pandemic that locked down economies for weeks and months. Businesses that had been sluggish prior to the pandemic crumbled as consumers hunkered down at home, many losing their jobs and millions facing a healthcare crisis. Commercial bankruptcy filings increased 29% in 2020, leaving unsecured creditors scrambling to recover pennies on the dollar. In this article we will review the bankruptcy climate of 2020, predictions for 2021, and what you need to do to ensure your company is a protected creditor.

Bankruptcy Current Affairs

Epiq recently reported bankruptcy filings across all chapters are at their lowest point since 1986. However, commercial Chapter 11 bankruptcies continued to rise year over year, with a 29% increase in 2020, for a total of 7,128 filings.

“The peak in Chapter 11 filings for Q2 and Q3 is due to preexisting distressed companies coupled with the onset of a zero-revenue environment. The federal backstop proved a vital lifeline for the stabilization of corporations to protect the US economy,” said Deirdre O’Connor, managing director of corporate restructuring at Epiq. Unsurprisingly, the foodservice industry was on track to lose $240 billion in sales by the end of 2020. Between March & July, the foodservice industry had lost $165 billion, and consumer spending in restaurants was down more than 30%. Restaurant chains that filed bankruptcy in 2020 included Sizzler, Ruby Tuesday, Friendly’s, Souplantation, Chuck E. Cheese, NPC International (parent company for 100s of Pizza Hut and Wendy’s locations), and California Pizza Kitchen. The energy, retail, and consumer services sectors with liabilities exceeding $50M had the most filings since 2009 according to Bloomberg. Amid the pandemic, well known retailers like J.C. Penney Co. Inc., Neiman Marcus Group Inc., Lord & Taylor LLC, Stein Mart Inc., True Religion, Modell’s Sporting Goods, J. Crew Group, Sur La Table, GNC, Ascena Retail Group, RTW Retailwinds, Guitar Center, and Pier 1 Imports filed bankruptcy in 2020. These bankruptcies not only impacted the retail employees, they also trickled up to landlords. As retailers missed rent payments, landlords found themselves suffering losses which sent them into bankruptcy as well. And as oil prices plummeted, energy companies collapsed at an alarming rate. From Latham & Watkins LLP: “In the first 10 months of the year, 101 oil companies with a total of $94 billion in debt filed for bankruptcy. More than 95% of these bankruptcies fell under the upstream exploration and production and oil field services segment with the largest filings being Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc., $11.8 billion, Chesapeake Energy Corp., $11.8 billion, and McDermott International Inc., $9.9 billion.” Then there is the healthcare industry. As if healthcare systems aren’t buried under an immense strain, poor financial health pushed dozens of large health systems to bankruptcy. According to the American Hospital Association “Hospitals face catastrophic financial challenges in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The AHA estimates a total four-month financial impact of $202.6 billion in losses for America’s hospitals and health systems, or an average of $50.7 billion per month.” Unfortunately, the financial distress pummeling these industries is likely to get worse long before it gets better. Despite the optimism surrounding vaccine rollouts, experts and analysts estimate a large wave of consumer and commercial bankruptcies in the first two quarters of 2021. Commercial bankruptcies are likely to include retail, healthcare, energy and additional industries like gyms, movie theaters, leisure services, and real estate firms.

11 Steps to Take Right Now

Fortunately, there is a silver lining in these grey financial times. Economic uncertainty offers many opportunities to improve your competitive position. Here are steps you can take right now:

  1. Re-examine your existing credit policies.
  2. Make your credit granting process more rigorous.
  3. Ensure your operational systems and customer agreements are in place with accurate and complete credit information.
  4. Research and verify your customers’ legal business names.
  5. Review The National Lien Digest for time and information requirements to protect your lien and bond claim rights.
  6. Monitor and review mechanic’s lien activity in LienFinder.
  7. If your department has been downsized and resources are limited, contact your credit vendors to obtain and verify credit history, credit scoring, UCC or lien searches.
  8. Implement Bankruptcy Monitoring to ensure you are timely notified of any debtor bankruptcy.
  9. Prepare Security Agreements as well as Personal and Corporate Guaranties, which are powerful tools to determine and/or minimize your risk.
  10. Talk to your trade groups and exchange financial information on mutual customers.
  11. Most importantly, secure your collateral.

Laws in Place to Protect Your Company

The U.S. government provides two bodies of law to help you with securing collateral: Article 9 – Secured Transactions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and The Mechanic’s Lien Laws. Who you are selling to determines which solution will put you in the best position to get paid. Here are several options to consider:

  • Article 9 provides the venue to secure personal property such as accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, general intangibles, goods, and software.
  • The UCC benefits your company when a customer defaults or files bankruptcy. If a customer defaults on payment terms and you have a signed Security Agreement that clearly defines default, you now have a breach of contract and can use this tool to repossess your goods or sue for payment.
  • In a bankruptcy, all creditors are split into two classes: secured and unsecured. In a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, secured creditors are paid first in the date order of the recorded financing statement. Unsecured creditors split what remains on a pro-rated basis, often receiving pennies on the dollar. The UCC filing elevates the status of your receivable to that of a secured creditor.
  • In a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, all secured creditors have the same status, which provides them with substantial leverage over the unsecured creditors as it relates to liquidation. Now is the time to incorporate the UCC process into your credit policies.
  • If you restructure past due receivables through installment notes, be sure to secure those notes.

UCC Article 9

Meeting the requirements of Article 9 requires you to collect information to better know and understand your new and existing customers. It is important that you:

  1. Have an updated signed Credit Application.
  2. Know the organization’s legal name and if it is registered with the Secretary of State, as well as its corporate address and shipping locations.
  3. Confirm the names of owners and officers.
  4. Understand your customer’s business and how it is using the products and services you provide.
  5. Verify whether your customer is in a community property state. If so, it is necessary that all liable parties sign all documents.

If you don’t have the time to gather this information, get your sales team involved. Offer a bonus to your team for accurately completed Credit Applications. And encourage them to be creative! For instance, rather than referring to the required but potentially threatening term “Security Agreement,” consider calling it a “Partnership Advantage Program.” Remember when customers turn to you for help, whether they are requesting extended payment terms, are currently past due or are seeking a credit limit increase, you’re in the perfect position to leverage this opportunity to become a secured creditor and reduce your credit risk.

Preliminary Notices, Mechanic’s Liens & Bond Claims

If you work in the construction industry you know that construction credit has its own unique process. To ensure that you’re making good credit decisions, take the time to update customer data and review your procedures. Start with researching your clients’ corporate information. Insist that job sheets be completed for every project, better yet, gather the information electronically with systems like the NCS Job App. Know the project address of where your materials or services are being furnished. Confirm who owns the property and who the general contractor is. You also have the opportunity to tie yourself into the trust fund of monies set aside for the project. To do so you must consistently serve preliminary notices and file Mechanic’s Liens or Bond Claims to secure your accounts receivables. These laws were created to protect owners of construction projects and ensure all contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers receive the money owed them. Carefully follow the statutory guidelines within each state because small missteps could jeopardize your security. Protect your rights and benefit from your secured interest in case your customer or someone else in the contractual chain defaults or files for bankruptcy. If you are concerned a customer may file for bankruptcy, consider exchanging a carefully worded lien waiver for payment. Currently, that payment may not be considered preferential because the debtor received something in consideration for the payment. Attorneys have successfully used this argument in defense to preference claims. Setting up a defense by using a lien waiver is a smart move, although it doesn’t provide a guarantee.

Credit & Compassion

Every credit professional needs a well-planned credit process with a side of reasonable compassion. Keep in mind that how you treat your customers today will reap great benefits tomorrow. Take a balanced approach and try not to be too aggressive towards a good customer who has recently fallen on hard times. The economy will rebound, and your customer will remember your tempered approach to their situation. After all, it is both what you do and how you do it that earns a client’s loyalty. And a loyal customer is the best hedge to ensure your company’s long-term health.

NCS Is Here for You

In today’s tough economy, working with a responsive, flexible strategic partner is critical. As you spend more time each week extinguishing proverbial credit fires, having an expert to react quickly when special problems arise can make an immense difference. Our expertise in UCCs, mechanic’s liens, and commercial collections, will help you minimize your risk and improve your profitability, and our investments in cutting edge technology found in LienFinder, The National Lien Digest, and LienTracker Online will save you time.

Serve Your Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien as Statute Dictates

Serve Your Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien as Statute Dictates Or Risk Losing Your Lien

What happens if the Sheriff’s Office is unsuccessful in personally serving your mechanic’s lien upon the project owner? In Pennsylvania, failing to meet the service requirements dictated by the mechanic’s lien statute could result in lost lien rights. A fate that one lien claimant knows all too well.

Pennsylvania Mechanic’s Lien Rights

For projects costing $1,500,000 or more, the owner or an agent for the owner may file a Notice of Commencement on the State Construction Notices Directory, prior to the commencement of any labor, work or materials being furnished for the searchable project. If filed, the Notice of Commencement shall be posted at the jobsite.

You should file a Notice of Furnishing on the State Construction Notices Directory within 45 days after first furnishing labor or materials. No Notice of Furnishing is required when contracting directly with the owner or when a notice of Commencement has not been properly filed and posted. A Notice of Non-Payment may be filed on the State Construction Notices Directory, for informational purposes, but is not required to preserve lien rights.

Serve a Formal Notice upon the owner after last furnishing and at least 30 days before filing the mechanic’s lien. File the mechanic’s lien within 6 months after last furnishing. You should serve notice of filing the lien upon the owner within 1 month from filing the lien and file an affidavit of service within 20 days from serving notice of the lien upon the owner.

And that’s where Pennsylvania statute got the better of the lien claimant… serve the lien upon the owner.

Case: Americo Construction Company v. Four Ten, LLC

Americo Construction Company (Americo) timely filed a mechanic’s lien for $26,000 for work it performed to the improvement of property owned by Four Ten, LLC (Four Ten).  After filing the mechanic’s lien, Americo hired the Sherriff to personally serve the lien upon Four Ten, which is precisely how statute instructs:

Title 49 P.S. Chapter 6, Sec. 1502 (c) Manner of service. Service of the notice of filing of claim shall be made by an adult in the same manner as a writ of summons in assumpsit, or if service cannot be so made then by posting upon a conspicuous public part of the improvement.

Americo advised the Sheriff that if personal service was unsuccessful, the Sheriff should post the lien to the property by a specified date to comply with statutory deadline of “1 month from filing the lien.” Seems OK, right?

According to the court of appeals’ opinion, the Sheriff’s first & second attempts at service were unsuccessful. The attempts were noted in the docket, but there was no indication whether a copy of the lien was posted at the property.

More than a month after the deadline to serve the lien, Americo received notification from the Sheriff on the failed attempts at service. Americo contacted the Sheriff and it was discovered the Sheriff had not posted the lien to the property as previously requested. Subsequently, the Sheriff went back to the property & posted the lien, then Americo filed an affidavit stating it served its lien.

  • The lien was filed 6/21/2018.
  • The lien needed to be served upon the owner by 7/21/2018.
  • The lien was eventually posted at the job site 8/15/2018.

Americo’s lien was officially served… 25 days late.

Of course, property owner Four Ten contested the validity of the lien. “Four Ten filed preliminary objections contending that Americo ran afoul of the thirty-day service requirement contained in the Mechanics’ Lien Law.”

But is it Americo’s fault if the Sheriff didn’t follow the instructions Americo provided? Americo argued it did everything it was required to do in accordance with statute. The court agreed with Americo:

“Americo did everything it was required to do effect service under the statute and our case law. Indeed, we would find that Americo did everything it reasonably could do to ensure timely service.”

So, what’s the problem?

Regardless of Americo following statutory requirements, the lien itself was not served in compliance with statute. The court said:

“Nevertheless, it remains undisputed that Americo did not timely serve Four Ten under the Law despite all of Americo’s efforts. We cannot ignore the unanimous authorities providing that the Mechanics’ Lien Law must be strictly construed. Further, our authorities are unanimous in holding that a claimant cannot substantially comply with the timeliness requirements: either service was timely or it was not.… service was not timely made on Four Ten, Americo is not entitled to the enhanced benefits of the Mechanics’ Lien Law. Strict compliance with the time limits in the act serve the purpose of providing a date certain for owners and third parties to be assured of the absence of such claims. Americo still retains a possible remedy at law, but in the absence of timely service, Americo’s mechanics’ lien claim was properly stricken.”

You may be thinking “…man, Pennsylvania isn’t messing around.” And you’d be right; this isn’t the first (or last, I’m sure) time a lien claimant has been burned by failing to comply with statute. Pennsylvania statute is clear, and courts take no issue with enforcing it.  Lesson? Follow the statute to the letter – always.

Shopping Malls Suffer Trickle-Up Effects of Retail Bankruptcies

Shopping Malls Suffer the Trickle-Up Effects of Retail Bankruptcies

OK, so “trickle-up effect” may not be a thing, but retail bankruptcies are on the rise and the impacts aren’t limited to the suppliers of inventory and the retail employees. As stores liquidate and close locations, shopping mall owners are losing tenant revenue, leading to their own bankruptcies.

Over 20 Big Name Retailers Have Filed for Bankruptcy in 2020

I won’t rehash the entire list here, but the ever-growing retail bankruptcy casualties of 2020 include Tailored Brands, Lord & Taylor, Ascena, Sur La Table, Lucky Brand, Neiman Marcus, Modell’s Sporting Goods, J. Crew, Centric Brands, Pier 1, and popular anchor store J.C. Penney.

If those that have filed isn’t enough, over a dozen other retailers are at risk of bankruptcy in 2020. According to Retail Dive, retailers like Express, J. Jill, Rite Aid, and DSW are high risk; not to mention recent headlines made by stores like Guitar Center and Petco.

The reality is retail wasn’t exactly thriving prior to the pandemic, but the pandemic has certainly not done the industry any favors. Brick & mortar retailers have been struggling to compete with the ease and variety of online shopping. Add in the complexities of a pandemic, and it’s a perfect storm for insolvency.

Recently, two large shopping mall entities have filed for bankruptcy protection: Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust (PREIT) and CBL & Associates Properties (CBL). How large is large? Bloomberg states the two entities account for over 87 million square feet of real estate across the U.S. and CNN Business says PREIT and CBL own about 130 malls nationwide.

Both PREIT and CBL stated a decrease in revenue from uncollected rents, a decline in consumer traffic, and existing debt in the billions, led to the bankruptcies. According to one report, more than 30 of CBL’s tenants have filed for bankruptcy in 2020.

PREIT’s bankruptcy petition estimates the company’s assets are $50M to $100M with liabilities of $1B to $10B (yes, billion), and it anticipates there will be enough funds to pay unsecured creditors. Its list of top creditors includes claims ranging from $800,000,000 owed to Wells Fargo Bank and over $200,000 owed to various construction companies.

CBL’s bankruptcy petition (which includes its 176 affiliates) estimates assets and liabilities are between $1B to $10B and anticipates funds will be available to pay unsecured creditors. Its list of top creditors includes a claim of $1.3B owed to Delaware Trust Company and several hundred thousand owed to various construction companies and suppliers.

Why These Bankruptcies Matter if You are Supplying Inventory to Retail

You don’t need me to tell you the heightened risk in retail, but you may want to look at these risks from a different angle. What happens if these malls close? What happens to the tenants and their unsold inventory? YOUR unsold inventory. File UCCs, even in consignment situations. In recent years we have seen the impact of unsecured consignment sales (um, Sports Authority bankruptcy) – you can’t afford to be unsecured in this economic climate.

Why These Bankruptcies Matter if You Are in Construction

In these two cases, not only are the various retail tenants at risk, but every company that is furnishing or has furnished to any improvement to these properties is also at risk. Yes, I’m talking to you – you, the company that furnished a new HVAC system, replaced the escalator, fixed the roof, and even replaced the store front glass in a remodel. Ensure you are securing your mechanic’s lien rights on every project, because the viability in the retail industry is growing weaker by the day.

You Received a Notice to Commence Suit, Now What?

Notice to Commence Suit

You Received a Notice to Commence Suit, Now What?

Your company is furnishing to a construction project and you are a brilliant credit professional, so you gather project information and serve your preliminary notice in accordance with the state statutory guidelines. In time, you recognize timely payment is going to be an issue, so you file a mechanic’s lien. With your mechanic’s lien filed, there may be negotiations occurring including mediation, but you keep an eye on the clock for your suit deadline. Then you receive a Notice to Commence Suit. What is a Notice to Commence Suit? Should you ignore it? Should you act?

What is a Notice to Commence Suit?

In many states, the statute provides a remedy for an owner to shorten the deadline for a lien claimant to file suit: the owner can file a Notice to Commence Suit. When properly notified by an owner or the court, any lien claimant who receives said notice must proceed with suit by the deadline stated, or they will lose their lien rights.

Should I Ignore It?

Absolutely – if you want to lose your security. No, do NOT ignore the Notice to Commence Suit. The validity of your mechanic’s lien, the crux of your security, depends on whether you timely adhere to the notice.

There was a case in New York where the lien claimant had properly filed its lien for around $22K.  The owner served a Notice to Commence Suit and the claimant had 30 days to make its move, but didn’t. The court held the lien claimant failed to comply with the notice and vacated its lien.  You certainly don’t want to find yourself in that position… no mechanic’s lien and no money. Take swift action if you receive a Notice to Commence Suit.

So, I Should Act?

Yes, yes, yes! When a Notice to Commence Suit or a Summons and Complaint is received by your office, in response to a lien that was filed on your behalf, take immediate steps to retain the services of an attorney to protect your rights.

Do You Have an Example of a Notice to Commence Suit?

Why, of course I do. Here’s an example of a Notice to Commence Suit for the state of Ohio (highlighting added).

notice to commence suit

In fact, I even have a second example. In Georgia, the demand is called Notice of Contest of Lien, but the end result is the same — proceed with suit or lose your lien.

NOTICE OF CONTEST OF LIEN

TO: [NAME AND ADDRESS OF LIEN CLAIMANT]

YOU ARE NOTIFIED THAT THE UNDERSIGNED CONTESTS THE CLAIM OF LIEN FILED BY YOU ON ___________20__ , AND RECORDED IN BOOK __ , __ PAGE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ___________COUNTY, GEORGIA, AGAINST PROPERTY OWNED BY ___________, AND THAT THE TIME WITHIN WHICH YOU MAY COMMENCE A LIEN ACTION TO ENFORCE YOUR LIEN IS LIMITED TO 60 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. THIS DAY ___________OF___________ , 20 __.

THIS ABOVE-REFERENCED LIEN WILL EXPIRE AND BE VOID IF YOU DO NOT: (1) COMMENCE A LIEN ACTION FOR RECOVERY OF THE AMOUNT OF THE LIEN CLAIM PURSUANT TO O.C.G.A. SECTION 44-14-361.1 WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE; AND (2) FILE A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF LIEN ACTION WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FILING THE ABOVE-REFERENCED LIEN ACTION.

SIGNED:
(OWNER, CONTRACTOR, AGENT OR ATTORNEY)

Is a Notice to Commence Suit the Same as Summons & Complaint?

Although similar in that both documents could shorten your suit deadline, a Notice to Commence Suit is different than a Summons & Complaint. When filing suit, the plaintiff must notify all other parties with an interest in the property that an action to foreclose is being filed. This filed document is often referred to as a Summons and Complaint.

At first glance, the Summons and Complaint may cause the unwary to believe they are being sued. In actuality, the Summons and Complaint is a legal action which requires all lien claimants to join in the foreclosure action within a specific time frame, by submitting an Answer and Cross Claim.

Frequently an Answer and Cross Claim is required in as little as 20 days from receipt of the Summons and Complaint. If a lien claimant does not respond by the deadline, lien rights may be lost.

Is Suit a Frequent Occurrence in Construction Credit?

We often discuss preliminary notices and mechanic’s liens, and admittedly rarely discuss suit. Why? Because 99% of the time, serving a preliminary notice and filing a mechanic’s lien will be enough to get you paid. Less than 1% of the notices & liens you file will go to suit. However, just because suit is rare doesn’t mean it should be ignored.

Remember, if a Notice to Commence Suit or a Summons and Complaint is received by your office, take immediate steps to retain the services of an attorney to protect your rights.