5 Problems with Preliminary Notices

Top 5 Problems with Preliminary Notices

Securing your mechanic’s lien and bond claim rights often begins with serving a preliminary notice. If the first step in securing your rights (serving a preliminary notice) isn’t a solid step, you may find yourself with an invalid mechanic’s lien and unpaid claim.

Here Are 5 Mistakes Commonly Seen with Preliminary Notices

1. Not Serving a Preliminary Notice

This may seem like a no-brainer, but it is an all too common problem. Contractors, subcontractors & suppliers find themselves in a position where they haven’t been paid, so they pursue the remedy of a mechanic’s lien or bond claim. Unfortunately, much to the dismay of these claimants, the courts interpret the law strictly and if a preliminary notice is required per statute and no preliminary notice was served, no lien rights exist.

Three cases come to mind: Mel Stevenson & Associates, Inc. V. Giles (2004), J. Roux Design & Associates, Inc. V. Backes Et Al (2005), and JE Dunn Construction v. (West Edge BK) (2010). In all three cases, the claimants didn’t serve a preliminary notice, filed a mechanic’s lien, pursued suit to enforce the mechanic’s lien and the lien was thrown out because a preliminary notice was required and not served.

2. Serving an Improperly Formatted Document

Nearly every state has a unique notice format and requirements which are enforced with strict scrutiny.  Some states are particular about the font type and size, which words or phrases are or are not in bold/italic/underlined and even the margin sizes.

Some companies learn this the hard way: “…A contractor must strictly comply with all statutory requirements for prelien notices.  Because Niewind did not provide prelien notice in the statutorily required type, the mechanic’s lien did not attach to the Carlsons’ property…”

3. The Notice is Missing Required Information (claim/contract/materials description)

Along the same lines as serving an improperly formatted document, often times, claimants serve an incomplete notice. Missing required information from a notice can be just as toxic as serving no notice at all. Again, review statute carefully and be sure to include the information required, such as specific parties, furnishing dates, contract & claim amounts or a description of the materials/labor provided.

4. Neglecting to Serve the Required Parties

Most states whose statute requires a preliminary notice to be served are quite specific as to which parties must receive a copy of the notice. If you don’t serve a required party with the notice, you may end up like Shady Tree Farms in Shady Tree Farms v. Omni Financial – Shady Tree Farms’ preliminary notice wasn’t served on the lender (a required party) and the trial court held that the mechanic’s lien for $1,959,244.50 could not be enforced.

5. Proper Service of the Preliminary Notice

We have previously discussed this particular issue on our blog: “Overnight Delivery, Registered Mail, Certified Mail! Oh My!” Review statute closely and deliver the notice as required by statute, whether it’s via certified mail, FedEx, Pony Express or Carrier Pigeon.

 The power of a preliminary notice is frequently underestimated and even misunderstood.

Most Recent Resources


Will Safe Harbor Ever Exist for Florida UCC Filings? Zero Tolerance

Safe Harbor couldn't save this UCC. Florida's 'zero tolerance' policy means you must strictly comply with Article 9-503(a). Learn more here!
Read More
white paper
White Paper

NCS Credit Lien Index 2022 Q3

The Lien Index increased 4 points in Q3 2022, an 11% climb over Q2 2022. As expected, Q3 mechanic's lien activity rose 11% over Q2, and activity remained lower than Q1, which peaked at 43. We anticipate the Index will increase 2%-5% in Q4. Download the full report for details.

Read More
live webinars
Live Webinar

The Basics of the UCC Process

Worried about customers filing bankruptcy? Concerned about extending credit to marginal accounts? UCC filings secure collateral in agreement with your customer’s promise to pay.
Read More