2 min read
Arbitration, Mediation, Lawsuit – What’s the Difference?
Over the holiday break, I spent some time reading articles I’ve (shamefully) had bookmarked for way too long. One of these articles reviewed the pros & cons of arbitration in construction disputes, although for me, it better explained the similarities and differences of arbitration and a lawsuit.
Construction Arbitration: The Pros and Cons by Jason Strickland of Ward and Smith, P.A.
Arbitration vs. Mediation vs. Lawsuit
I don’t think I have ever confused a lawsuit with arbitration or mediation, but I have certainly confused arbitration with mediation. Here are key features explained by Strickland:
“Mediation is a settlement conference in which the parties meet (typically in person) and use a third-party neutral to act as a settlement facilitator. The third-party neutral is called the mediator.”
It’s important to note, the mediator can’t force a settlement – which I didn’t know. I assumed the mediator has the same powers that an arbitrator has.
“A lawsuit is conducted in a court of law and usually is initiated by a plaintiff filing a complaint, in which the plaintiff will ask for some form of relief from the defendant.”
In the NCS world, a lawsuit is often referred to as “suit to enforce…” a lien or bond claim.
Now, this explanation of arbitration is new to me, in part:
“Arbitration is essentially a lawsuit but without court involvement.”
Wow. “Arbitration is essentially a lawsuit but without court involvement.” Yes! That’s a great explanation. Why? Because arbitration is binding, just like a legal decision.
Mind. Blown.
“The parties agree… to submit their dispute to arbitration rather than to pursue a lawsuit in court. The parties’ agreement gives the arbitrator the power to issue a decision as to the parties’ rights and obligations, and such decision will be legally binding on all parties. Thus, arbitration is very different from mediation because the third-party neutral provides a legally binding decision. However, arbitration is not mutually exclusive with mediation. In many cases, parties will have a dispute resolution provision in their contract that will allow, or require, the parties to mediate first, and if the mediation is unsuccessful, to then submit their dispute to arbitration.” – Jason Strickland
The Differences (Pros & Cons) Between Arbitration and Lawsuits
Strickland reviews several differences between arbitration and a lawsuit. Here’s a quick table to break down Strickland’s points.
So, who wins? Arbitration or Lawsuit?
Obviously, it will depend on your circumstances and contractual language, but both options have their pros & cons. A key benefit in arbitration is the efficiency; with a less formal environment and the rarity of appeal, it can prevent a case from dragging on. On the flip side, construction disputes typically involve a myriad of parties, which can be easier to accommodate within a court/lawsuit setting.
Podcast: How Price Escalation Clauses Protect Subcontractors
How do escalation clauses protect subcontractors & material suppliers? Attorney Mark Gryzmala shares contract strategies to manage rising construction costs.
Practical Guide: How Do Lien Waivers Work in Construction?
Download our guide to lien waivers in construction. Learn how to choose the right waiver for contractors, meet state requirements, and protect payment.
Provincial Construction Payment Rights in Canada
Discover your payment rights on provincial construction projects in Canada, including how to secure bond claim rights and navigate Public Works Act claims.