Arbitration, Mediation, Lawsuit – What’s the Difference?
Over the holiday break, I spent some time reading articles I’ve (shamefully) had bookmarked for way too long. One of these articles reviewed the pros & cons of arbitration in construction disputes, although for me, it better explained the similarities and differences of arbitration and a lawsuit.
Construction Arbitration: The Pros and Cons by Jason Strickland of Ward and Smith, P.A.
Arbitration vs. Mediation vs. Lawsuit
I don’t think I have ever confused a lawsuit with arbitration or mediation, but I have certainly confused arbitration with mediation. Here are key features explained by Strickland:
“Mediation is a settlement conference in which the parties meet (typically in person) and use a third-party neutral to act as a settlement facilitator. The third-party neutral is called the mediator.”
It’s important to note, the mediator can’t force a settlement – which I didn’t know. I assumed the mediator has the same powers that an arbitrator has.
“A lawsuit is conducted in a court of law and usually is initiated by a plaintiff filing a complaint, in which the plaintiff will ask for some form of relief from the defendant.”
In the NCS world, a lawsuit is often referred to as “suit to enforce…” a lien or bond claim.
Now, this explanation of arbitration is new to me, in part:
“Arbitration is essentially a lawsuit but without court involvement.”
Wow. “Arbitration is essentially a lawsuit but without court involvement.” Yes! That’s a great explanation. Why? Because arbitration is binding, just like a legal decision.
“The parties agree… to submit their dispute to arbitration rather than to pursue a lawsuit in court. The parties’ agreement gives the arbitrator the power to issue a decision as to the parties’ rights and obligations, and such decision will be legally binding on all parties. Thus, arbitration is very different from mediation because the third-party neutral provides a legally binding decision. However, arbitration is not mutually exclusive with mediation. In many cases, parties will have a dispute resolution provision in their contract that will allow, or require, the parties to mediate first, and if the mediation is unsuccessful, to then submit their dispute to arbitration.” – Jason Strickland
The Differences (Pros & Cons) Between Arbitration and Lawsuits
Strickland reviews several differences between arbitration and a lawsuit. Here’s a quick table to break down Strickland’s points.
So, who wins? Arbitration or Lawsuit?
Obviously, it will depend on your circumstances and contractual language, but both options have their pros & cons. A key benefit in arbitration is the efficiency; with a less formal environment and the rarity of appeal, it can prevent a case from dragging on. On the flip side, construction disputes typically involve a myriad of parties, which can be easier to accommodate within a court/lawsuit setting.
We compiled a quick list of frequently asked questions about Blanket UCC filings. Check out Blanket UCC Filings & Your Frequently Asked Questions!
- January 22: The Basics of the Lien & Bond Claim Process
- February 5: An Advanced Look at the UCC Process
- February 12: The UCC – A Powerful but Underused Collection Tool in Construction Lending
- February 19: An Advanced Look at the Lien & Bond Claim Process
- March 5: Implementing a UCC Program – Overcoming Obstacles
- March 19: Implementing a Lien/Bond Claim Program – Overcoming Obstacles
March 18-March 20 we will be at the CRF 2019 March Forum in Tucson, AZ.
Don’t forget to bookmark our Events Page!