Arbitration, Mediation, Lawsuit – What’s the Difference?

Arbitration, Mediation, Lawsuit – What’s the Difference?

Over the holiday break, I spent some time reading articles I’ve (shamefully) had bookmarked for way too long. One of these articles reviewed the pros & cons of arbitration in construction disputes, although for me, it better explained the similarities and differences of arbitration and a lawsuit.

Construction Arbitration: The Pros and Cons by Jason Strickland of Ward and Smith, P.A.

Arbitration vs. Mediation vs. Lawsuit

I don’t think I have ever confused a lawsuit with arbitration or mediation, but I have certainly confused arbitration with mediation. Here are key features explained by Strickland:

Mediation is a settlement conference in which the parties meet (typically in person) and use a third-party neutral to act as a settlement facilitator.  The third-party neutral is called the mediator.”

It’s important to note, the mediator can’t force a settlement – which I didn’t know. I assumed the mediator has the same powers that an arbitrator has.

“A lawsuit is conducted in a court of law and usually is initiated by a plaintiff filing a complaint, in which the plaintiff will ask for some form of relief from the defendant.”

In the NCS world, a lawsuit is often referred to as “suit to enforce…” a lien or bond claim.

Now, this explanation of arbitration is new to me, in part:

Arbitration is essentially a lawsuit but without court involvement.”

Wow. “Arbitration is essentially a lawsuit but without court involvement.” Yes! That’s a great explanation. Why? Because arbitration is binding, just like a legal decision.

Mind. Blown.

“The parties agree… to submit their dispute to arbitration rather than to pursue a lawsuit in court.  The parties’ agreement gives the arbitrator the power to issue a decision as to the parties’ rights and obligations, and such decision will be legally binding on all parties. Thus, arbitration is very different from mediation because the third-party neutral provides a legally binding decision.  However, arbitration is not mutually exclusive with mediation.  In many cases, parties will have a dispute resolution provision in their contract that will allow, or require, the parties to mediate first, and if the mediation is unsuccessful, to then submit their dispute to arbitration.” – Jason Strickland

The Differences (Pros & Cons) Between Arbitration and Lawsuits

Strickland reviews several differences between arbitration and a lawsuit. Here’s a quick table to break down Strickland’s points.

So, who wins? Arbitration or Lawsuit?

Obviously, it will depend on your circumstances and contractual language, but both options have their pros & cons. A key benefit in arbitration is the efficiency; with a less formal environment and the rarity of appeal, it can prevent a case from dragging on. On the flip side, construction disputes typically involve a myriad of parties, which can be easier to accommodate within a court/lawsuit setting.

Most Recent Resources

Blog

No Lien Rights for Rental Equipment Companies in Pennsylvania

Review this recent Pennsylvania legal decision and how UCC filings are poised to be the payment leverage rental equipment companies need.
Read More
white paper
White Paper

Healthcare Bankruptcies: A Financial Risk to Suppliers

Learn how creditors providing everything from basic office supplies to extensive operating room equipment have an opportunity to file a UCC to recover funds and repossess equipment.

Read More
live webinars
Live Webinar

The Importance of Gathering Job Information

Do you realize the importance of obtaining job information as it relates to the protection of your lien and bond claim rights?
Read More